One would think The New York Times, quick to chronicle crazy parents in
more men are seeking the permission of their fiancees’ fathers before proposing. The
article admits that there are no statistics to track the trend and discloses its methods:
talking to bridal stores and engaged couples. It seems to track all sides of the issue,
presenting the opinions of those who think the ritual is a quaint but meaningless traditions
along with those who think it undermines women, although it did not delve into this more
extreme opposition to the practice until the end of the article. Too bad, because it would
probably have been more thought-provoking to read comments from the BU women’s
studies professor than from the young fiancés, whose insipid replies do not provide much
reason for their following this tradition except for the fact that it is a tradition.
There must be something to the tradition, though, because allusions to asking permission
for a woman’s hand in marriage pop up again in The Washington Post today. In his
column on new ethics laws regarding senators and lobbyists, Jeffrey H. Birnbaum raises a
question regarding the ban on lobbyists giving gifts to lawmakers and their aides. What
if, he asks, a lobbyist wants to propose to his girlfriend, a Senate staffer? Birnbaum’s
question is an interesting twist on the interpretation of the law, but apparently it is not a
loophole, since he points out the fiancé would have to ask the permission not only of her
father, but of her employer, too.
has some of the best news coverage, as it continues to follow the death of Army National
Guard Spc. Ciara Durkin. Today’s article draws out the Durkin family’s close ties to
extensive coverage of her death not just in her home
country, which adds depth to her story and suggests that local
behind in their own coverage.
No comments:
Post a Comment