Sunday, September 16, 2007

Money, war and...coffee on a Sunday afternoon

Isn’t Starbucks supposed to be the coffee-chain of choice for the “bohemian bourgeoisie,” as David Brooks called them? The New York Times writes from a lofty perch looking down on the coffee chain that has taken over the world in an article about a former ad executive who stooped to take a job that one would think would be “beneath him” at Starbucks, learned to love it and wrote a book about the experience that has been optioned for film by Tom Hanks. The article does a good job conveying Michael Gates Gill’s “life-changing” experience—perhaps too good a job. The reporter clings to the glamorous details of Gill’s former life, hobnobbing with Kennedys and his father’s colleagues at The New Yorker. The reporter’s own skepticism towards Gill’s happiness, which she acknowledges in the article, colors the reader’s opinion, as well. For all the reasons the reporter offers that Gill should feel above this job, he is the one who points out that Starbucks is, after all, “socially acceptable.”

While Gill gets used to a pay cut, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick hopes to drastically increase public revenue and create new jobs in his approval to license three resort casinos in the state. The Boston Globe article is structured clearly as an “inverted pyramid,” disclosing the key details first before moving into anonymous comments from state officials and the larger economic development program of which the casinos will be a part.

A Washington Post article on Barack Obama’s position on the Iraq War provides an informative analysis of the evolution of his opinions. The article seems to give more weight to his 2002 speech against the war and the fact that he opposed it before it began than to his inaction as a senator. The article quickly points out that Obama’s detractors say he did little to oppose the war as a member of Congress, despite his lofty rhetoric as a senatorial candidate. I appreciated the inclusion of Elizabeth Edwards’ comment that amidst a liberal audience in Chicago, Obama could get away with opposing the war during his run for the Senate.

The war becomes less remote in a Patriot Ledger article that honors its local troops with a story about a support group in Hudson for families who have loved ones serving in the military overseas. There are several thoughtful images captured in the article, from the two-year-old who mistakes a young new recruit in camouflage for her father, still overseas, to the mother who wears a picture of her 19-year-old son around her neck on a dog tag. I would have like to see a few more facts accompanying the human interest aspects of the story, though: how many troops from this region are currently deployed in Iraq? How many of their families meet in some sort of support group? Still, it is a heartwarming picture of local communities banding together.

No comments: